I am a big fan of using choice as a way to coerce kids into doing what I want them to do.
I learned this early in my teaching career. I used to spout platitudes like, “You always have a choice, it just may not be a good choice,” but I got tired of hearing teens make gagging noises. So I halted my sermonizing and started putting the philosophy into practice. When one of those pubescent creatures was doing something highly annoying, I’d pause and offer a choice, such as “You can either stop making farting noises and stay in this classroom, or you can make your farting noises all the way down to the principal’s office.”
This either-or strategy has been useful for parenting five-year-olds. Think of it as bribery that’s been souped up.
A Vivian Example: “You can either eat your carrots and have dessert, or you can leave them on your plate to fester and decay while you starve for days to come.”
A William Example: “You can either stop sucking on your toes, or you can keep sucking on them and never watch The Backyardigans again, ever.”
In case I’ve confused you, I’ll illustrate it mathematically:
CHOICE + HYPERBOLE = MANIPULATION
I must use this technique often, because yesterday Vivian cornered me with her own version of Manipulation 101.
I was in the kitchen doing something useful, like boiling water for the fourth time with the hope that I’d actually remember to make a cup of tea while the water was still hot.
“Mom,” Vivian said, “would you like to sit on the couch and read me a book, or would you like to sit on the floor and play Fish?”
I took a moment to process the options.

Option One
or

Option Two
And you know what?
It worked.
A five-year-old connived me, her lackluster mother, to follow her agenda.
She is a master apprentice.
Soon she’ll be teaching Manipulation 101, implementing a number of new techniques she’s piloting during Spring Break-down.
*
Feel free to share any of your tips for Manipulation 101.








